View Draw
Ben Shelton
To Win first set
Botic Van De Zandschulp
To Win first set
Ben Shelton
To win 2-0
Botic Van De Zandschulp
To win 2-0
Botic Van De Zandschulp
To win 2-1
Ben Shelton
To win 2-1
over 20
Games
Prediction of Botic Van De Zandschulp [89th] vs Ben Shelton [15th] Head-to-Head At The 2025 BMW Open - Munich (04-16-25)
By Wojtek Kolan - April 15, 2025
Next playing in BMW Open - Munich | Second round
Clay COURT
Wednesday
11:10 AM (CET)
Kolkata
Convert to your time
Estimated local
Form
L W L W W L L W L W
Form
L W L W W W L L L WZandschulp vs. Shelton Forecast
Calculated from the implied probability from the match winner, Shelton has a 56.33% chance to get the victory.
IMPORTANT: Subscribe to the Matchstat.com tennis predictions club to show implied vs actual predictions to discover value bets so you can win big.
| Prediction | Chance To Win |
|---|---|
| Ben Shelton | 56.33 % |
| Botic Van De Zandschulp | 48.08 % |
|
Above is calculated from odds. Login now to reveal our expert picks. |
Head To Head: Zandschulp 1 - 0 Shelton
Zandschulp and Shelton have played three sets in total, with Zandschulp winning two and Shelton one. Their most recent match was at the U.S. Open in New York on August 26, 2021, during the Q2 round on a hard court, where Zandschulp emerged victorious with scores of 3-6, 7-5, 6-4. How will their next encounter unfold?
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Botic Van De Zandschulp | 1 |
| Ben Shelton | 0 |
| Zandschulp | Stats | Shelton |
|---|---|---|
| 45% (9-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 61% (11-7) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 89 | Ranking | 15 |
| 22 | Highest Rank | 12 |
| 29 | Age | 22 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 7 | Titles | 6 |
| 62% (362-225) | Career Total W/L | 64% (139-77) |
| $3,420,360 | Career Prize Money | $6,407,295 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Who Do Our Users Think Will Win?
Who will win?
Vote Yourself To Show Results
Who will win?
Total votes: 600+
83.33%
16.67%
1
Your Vote
16 Apr 2025 / Second
Ben Shelton implied favourite from odds → 56.33%
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
Edge
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
Zandschulp VS Shelton H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 7-5 6-4 | |||||
Zandschulp VS Shelton H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 15 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Current Event Stats
BMW Open - Munich
Clay| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Total Matches | 1 |
| 2:32:32 | Last Match | 2:24:37 |
| 4:58:32 | Total Time | 2:24:37 |
| 0.47 | Aces Per Game | 0.5 |
| 14 | Aces Total | 9 |
| 0.33 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
| 10 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 61% (111/182) | 1st Serve % | 54% (62/114) |
| 75% (83/111) | 1st Serve Win % | 77% (48/62) |
| 44% (31/71) | 2nd Serve Win % | 69% (36/52) |
| 35% (7/20) | Total Break Points Won % | 0% (0/3) |
| 42% (5/12) | Total Break Points Saved | 90% (9/10) |
| 77% (23/30) | Service Hold (%) | 94% (17/18) |
| 77% (23/30) | Opponent Hold % | 100% (18/18) |
| 39% (76/193) | Return Points Win % | 21% (20/97) |
| 51% (190/375) | Total Points Won | 49% (104/211) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreak Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0.00 | Tiebreaks Per Match | 2.00 |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Ben Shelton Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Zandschulp 1 - 0 Shelton
Editorial Prediction:
When two formidable players like Zandschulp and Shelton face off, fans are keen to dissect every bit of their gameplay statistics to predict the victor. Let's begin with their second serve performance over the last six months. Is Zandschulp struggling, winning only 43.6% of points? Meanwhile, Shelton secures a notable 52.8%, giving him a slight edge in that department. The correlation between second serve stats and match outcomes cannot be overlooked.
Now, what about their performance when tasked with returning serves? Zandschulp is aptly aggressive, winning 46.95% of his opponent's second serve points compared to Shelton's 38.74%. For first serves, Zandschulp again exceeds expectation at 27.55%, with Shelton slightly trailing at 22.19%. These return stats are crucial in head-to-head matchups, painting a picture of who might control the rally better.
In the heat of the match, who keeps their cool under pressure? Zandschulp has a breakpoint save rate of 51.57% but Shelton counters with an even more impressive 57.05%. Knowing when and how these players dig deep could be pivotal for live betting enthusiasts as the match progresses.
Let's stretch our view to their performance over the past year. Zandschulp has clinched 52.17% of his matches (W/L 36/33), contrasting with Shelton's more favorable 59.38% win rate (W/L 38/26). This brings a broader context to their head-to-head prediction. When examining their preferred playing surfaces, both shine brightest on indoor hard courts. Zandschulp wins 63% (W/L 93/54) on this surface, but Shelton outdoes him with a striking 77% win rate (W/L 40/12).
Each player's experience on the main tour matters. Zandschulp has emerged victorious in 46.43% of his matches (W/L 13/15), whereas Shelton's win rate is 54.17% (W/L 13/11). The quality of their opponents affects how these figures translate into the upcoming battle; Zandschulp's foes have had an average rank of 151.75, with Shelton's slightly lower at 159.13. Their previous showdown at the U.S. Open saw Zandschulp triumphing in a tight three-set battle, suggesting a mental edge.
If this clash extends to a deciding set, it’s a close call. Zandschulp holds a 46% win rate in deciding sets over the last year, marginally less than Shelton's 48%. And when it comes to converting break points, Zandschulp proves more efficient, capitalizing on 30.99% of his chances, while Shelton lags at 22.33%.
So, who will emerge victorious in this thrilling contest? While both players exhibit remarkable skills, Zandschulp's superior return stats and breakpoint conversion, along with his previous head-to-head win against Shelton, sway the prediction in his favor. Expect Zandschulp to edge out Shelton in what promises to be an electrifying match.
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Roberto Bautista Agut
72%
(
60 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
11
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
36 of
97)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
93)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Novak Djokovic
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
87
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Nick Kyrgios
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(7) 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
39%
(
21 of
54)
5
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Lukas Klein
51%
(
63 of
124)
1st Serve %
56%
(
71 of
127)
7
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
8
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
44%
(
27 of
61)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
44%
(
55 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
63 of
127)
132
Total Points Won
119
|
5-7 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
37 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Ben Shelton Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Borna Gojo
54%
(
62 of
114)
1st Serve %
70%
(
68 of
97)
9
Aces
14
5
Double Faults
1
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
57 of
68)
69%
(
36 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
0%
(
0 of
3)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
26%
(
30 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
21%
(
20 of
97)
104
Total Points Won
107
|
4-6 7-6(6) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
Player
Ben Shelton
58%
(
52 of
90)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
37 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
40 of
74)
93
Total Points Won
71
|
6-7(2) 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Ben Shelton
66%
(
71 of
108)
1st Serve %
68%
(
67 of
99)
8
Aces
17
0
Double Faults
2
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
53 of
67)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
38 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
28 of
99)
98
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(3) 2-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Ben Shelton
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
21 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Brandon Nakashima
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
62)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Karen Khachanov
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
8
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
28 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Mariano Navone
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
David Goffin
Player
Ben Shelton
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
16 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Flavio Cobolli
69%
(
54 of
78)
1st Serve %
52%
(
41 of
79)
13
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
33 of
41)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
22 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
25 of
79)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(4) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jaume Antoni Munar Clar
Player
Ben Shelton
75%
(
47 of
63)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
2
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
16 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
22 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Zandschulp vs Shelton?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Zandschulp Vs Shelton is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62% (169/103) | Win/Loss | 55% (18/15) |
| 60% (382/252) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (47/41) |
| 54% (3128/2658) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (432/435) |
| 0.28 | Aces Per Game | 0.45 |
| 787 | Aces Total | 191 |
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.35 |
| 871 | Total Double Faults | 149 |
| 1:23:4 | Average Match Time | 1:54:49 |
| 185.24 | Average Opponent Rank | 141.15 |
| 61% (9404/15405) | 1st Serve % | 62% (1623/2616) |
| 69% (6456/9404) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (1175/1623) |
| 48% (2880/6001) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (492/993) |
| 45% (839/1866) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (74/184) |
| 44% (7004/16080) | Return Points Win % | 35% (860/2489) |
| 63% (164/260) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (16/29) |
| 43% (3/7) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (2/4) |
| 54% (33/61) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 64% (9/14) |
| 53% (45/85) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (7/16) |
| 90% (163/147) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 69% (16/11) |
| 10% (163/16) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 31% (16/5) |
| 21% (108/23) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 41% (17/7) |
See recent tennis photos of Zandschulp and Shelton
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Botic Van De Zandschulp
View full predicted draw for Zandschulp in Munich
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Ben Shelton
View full predicted draw for Shelton in Munich
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
